Fall 2012 ME 395 - GSI Josh Lacey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Fall 2012 ME 395 - GSI Josh Lacey

This is a discussion forum for Josh Lacey's lab sections of Fall 2012 ME 395.
 
HomeHome  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

 

 Instron load cell model

Go down 
2 posters
AuthorMessage
GSI Overlord
Admin



Posts : 126
Join date : 2012-08-30

Instron load cell model Empty
PostSubject: Instron load cell model   Instron load cell model Icon_minitimeMon Sep 17, 2012 2:35 pm

I received the following question:

"What series does the Instron load cell belong to? I need this to calculate the accuracy error."

The load cell everyone used in the experiment was the 10kN load cell, 2518-103.
Back to top Go down
http://fall2012me395.forumotion.com
96reyalslana




Posts : 1
Join date : 2012-09-16

Instron load cell model Empty
PostSubject: Re: Instron load cell model   Instron load cell model Icon_minitimeTue Sep 18, 2012 12:00 pm

Laundry list of question:

So in regards to the force portion of the lab, I do not see any information in the MBQ sheet about the strain gauge load cell. I do see the information about the instron load cell though. Where are we getting information on the strain gauge for the error analysis and portability portion of the lab?

Based on your other posts, accuracy is only dependent on our weights and not on the actual load cells, correct?

When finding resolution for instron and strain guage load cells, is it wrong to just count the decimal places that the machine outputs? I could not find any information for bit rates to use the resolution formula given in lab. What should I do here?

How should we assess portability? What is it relative to?

Back to top Go down
GSI Overlord
Admin



Posts : 126
Join date : 2012-08-30

Instron load cell model Empty
PostSubject: Re: Instron load cell model   Instron load cell model Icon_minitimeTue Sep 18, 2012 5:32 pm

You are to assume that the raw voltages the load cell and strain gauge are spitting out are totally accurate and you trust the devices, so there is no source of accuracy error there. The strain gauge is actually custom made, so there are no specifications for that (that little square of wire loops that was part of the long column sticking down in the Instron machine).

In thinking about resolution, it actually has to do with what your analog-to-digital conversion hardware is capable of, which is the NI DAQ in this case. That device is 24 bits, so it's going to divide the range of output into 2^24 increments. However you also brought up the point about the digits that the LabVIEW interface actually outputs and saves to the text file. This resolution may be more coarse than what the ADC is actually capable of producing, so you should check just to be sure.

The statement of portability would be presumably based on the size of those devices and if they can fit in a field kit, as referenced in the scenario letter. Again, the strain gauge was the small square with the wire loops going through it, and the load cell is just one of those cylinders inside the Instron (you can see a picture of it on CTools).
Back to top Go down
http://fall2012me395.forumotion.com
Sponsored content





Instron load cell model Empty
PostSubject: Re: Instron load cell model   Instron load cell model Icon_minitime

Back to top Go down
 
Instron load cell model
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Fall 2012 ME 395 - GSI Josh Lacey :: Lab Questions :: Lab 1-
Jump to: